There are 4 dimensions that make up this sense of "sport ethic" often found within athletes. According to Hughes and Coakley sport ethic emphasizes "scarifice for The Game, seeking distinction, taking risks, and challenging limits" (307). It is believed that athletes conform to this sport ethic ideology because it is what classifies one as a "real athlete." Those who adapt this ideology are seen as a deviant individual of the larger society and in the sport as well. Personally, I think athletes conform to this ideology because it's embedded into the sport systems itself. It's just what the game has evolved into and if you want to be an elite athlete, you will accept these 4 dimensions.
I myself have experienced these criteria's of what defines "sport ethic" at one point or another. I used to play on a competitive volleyball team for a number of years growing up where I travelled and participated in tournaments all the way from the east coast to the west. I practiced 3 days a week and had day long tournaments on Sunday's and if we were traveling to tournaments in other states those usually lasted 3-4 days. That alone displays sacrifice for the game. Also, when playing volleyball I wanted to be the setter who always started every game and played through majority of the game if not all of it. I loved that I touched the ball every play and because of my sets/assists I could help win games and excel at key plays. Something about the energy of the game and my obsession with winning played a part with my experience.
I like how you talked about the "energy of the game." I think that's a huge push for athletes to succeed. When you're in the moment and everyone is cheering, there's an energy unlike any other.
ReplyDelete-Conner Morris